John
Tredgett’s views of my preaching
3rd July
2023
These views were communicated after the meeting with
Steve and Val and all the church elders.
They
claimed: “Andrew’s preaching was lacking in exposition”
I just
struggle to see this.
You
preached through Proverbs, Luke and Hebrews and, looking at one passage after
another.
Your
preaching has changed a little bit.
You are focusing
on a particular verse or so. This is not a bad thing.
Martyn
Lloyd-Jones, he would do a whole series on just one particular verse.
Your
sermons are scriptural, even if they're not expository in the way, say others,
others do it.
Exposition
I don't think is sort of on or off.
It's more like
a spectrum.
it's not simply
going through a passage, verse by verse, phrase by phrase.
They claimed:
“The introductions are too long and the overall length of the sermons are too
long.”
This has
been an issue with both of us. It is something we all work on.
There is a
tension between having freedom to preach as the Spirit leads and having to keep
track on the clock.
They
claimed that “Apologetics has become too dominant.”
Your
apologetic studies are coming into things more.
Your
studies on languageits nature and the whole significance of the somebody,
someone distinction. Have been mentioned
The real
definition of what faith is has been focused on.
I've been
stretched by these things, and I do enjoy preaching on these things.
These
things appeal to me because I like thinking about ideas and books and theories
and so on. I can see how some people would prefer simpler preaching.
I do think
that the church and Christians generally would benefit greatly from what you're
researching, you know.
You're mining
very deeply, and maybe some people are used to sort of shallower depths, but
maybe just the format, the medium to share your findings might be better suited
to to writing to a website I think you've mentioned, or articles for ET or a
book rather than the pulpit.
As a couple
we have benefited greatly from your preaching.
They
claimed “That your preaching is too negative.”
I struggle to
see this. I don't think that that it's lopsided sort of in your preaching and
you've become overly negative.
They
claimed “That you are displaying too much emotion.”
I don't
really have any issue here, you can generally be quite be quite reserved so for
you to get impassioned or tearful maybe it's just more of a shock rather than
something that's bad practice as a preacher.
27th October 2023 John Tredgett
I don’t think anyone believes you have taught
heresy. No-one doubts that you have tremendous gifts when it comes to
preaching, praying, pastoral care, hospitality, generosity
November
10th 2023
We have undergone much soul-searching, prayer and
consultation over the last few months, and our joint conclusion is that
the changes in Andrew’s preaching over the last eighteen months have been of
the Lord. We acknowledge that new ground is being broken, but that the course
Andrew is pursuing remains biblical and worthy of our support.
We look forward to the future in hope, both for you, your
family, and for the church you have pastored faithfully since 2004.
Please note carefully that this implies that the
faithfulness continues to the day of this email... ie November 14th.
The "church members" meeting on November
20th was the place where a new view of me and my preaching was
announced and argued for. There had clearly been some work done in preparing
this new view of me and my preaching including the canvassing of previous
attendees and prior members who had left us for one reason or another. A
document was prepared for attendees at this meeting which has never been shown
to me or my family despite the fact that members of my family asked for it
while still being church members.
On Sunday 14th December John expressed his
agreement with this statement (composed by Dr. John Crosby):
159 Regarding your current situation, and writing from a
position of deep respect, I would urge you to prayerfully consider the
Apostle Paul’s exhortation to the Ephesian Elders (Acts 20:28). In my
opinion, until recent times, you fulfilled that request with some distinction.
However, since then this (sadly) has not been the case.
When fed the spiritual food which is ‘convenient’
for the believer, they will grow in grace, or to use another metaphor, they
will be edified and ‘built up in their most holy faith’ (Jude, v.20). This was,
I believe, the outcome of your ministry until recent times.
When you informed us of your studies, I was greatly
encouraged and hoped they would lead you to a deeper understanding of the
scripture and enhance your ministry. With great sadness, I do not think this
has been the case. As a consequence, the feeding of the body of Christ has
been seriously affected. Whatever the future in the Lord’s will holds for
you, I respectfully urge you to consider these matters.
On the 20th December John gives expression
to the new view in a communication with Alan Pallister:
I've asked myself, have they all simultaneously gone
mad? Or been deceived? Or become possessed? If not, the only alternative seems
to be that something is indeed not quite right with Andrew's
preaching, and which has elicited this widespread response.
I dare not share with Andrew the full extent of those
who have expressed concerns. Andrew has already had a nervous
breakdown earlier in his life, and I fear that this would cause another one -
if not suicide.
No comments:
Post a Comment